Re: [PATCH 13/16] t3700: Skip a test with backslashes in pathspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sonntag, 22. März 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> I do not think the justification for this change is explained well enough.
>
> The test prepares a file whose name consists of "ef, oh, bra, oh, you,
> ket, bee, ei and are" (no backslashes), and passes a filespec that quotes
> bra and ket with backslash so glob won't misinterpret as if we are asking
> to add "ef oh followed by either oh or you followed by bee ei are".  There
> is no path that has a backslash in it involved.
>
> If this does not work on Windows, there is something else going on.  Is it
> that the shell eats one level of backslash too much or something?

I added these two paragraphs:

The test verifies that glob special characters can be escaped with
backslashes.  In particular, the string fo\[ou\]bar is given to git.

On Windows, this does not work because backslashes are first of all
directory separators, and first thing git does with a pathspec from the
command line is to convert backslashes to forward slashes.

-- Hannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux