Hi, On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Amos King wrote: > There is now a faux remote created in order to > be passed to http_init. > > Signed-off-by: Amos King <amos.l.king@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > http-push.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/http-push.c b/http-push.c > index 9ac2664..468d5af 100644 > --- a/http-push.c > +++ b/http-push.c > @@ -2195,7 +2195,16 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) > > memset(remote_dir_exists, -1, 256); > > - http_init(NULL); > + /* > + * This is a faked remote so that http_init can > + * get the correct data for builidng out athorization. > + */ You might want to pass this through aspell ;-) Altough it will not suggest 'out ->our', I guess... > + struct remote *remote; > + remote = xcalloc(sizeof(*remote), 1); > + ALLOC_GROW(remote->url, remote->url_nr + 1, remote->url_alloc); > + remote->url[remote->url_nr++] = repo->url; > + > + http_init(remote); Would 'fake' not be a more appropriate name than 'remote'? That would also make the patch 1/2 rather unnecessary (I also have to admit that I do not find 'repo' a better name, as we have a repository both locally and remotely, and this _is_ the remote repository, not the local one). Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
