Allan Caffee <allan.caffee <at> gmail.com> writes: > > I know that _some_ people arn't particularly fond of colors, but I was > wondering how difficult it would be to colorize the edges on the > --graph drawn by the log command? It can be a little tricky trying to > follow them with a relatively complex history. I was thinking something > like gitk already does. Is anybody else interested in seeing this? > > ~Allan This may be clueless (I suspect that it is) but I have never understood the meaning of the different line colors in gitk. They seems arbitrary to me. I get that the current HEAD is represented as a yellow dot, but that's it. (As an aside, it might be nice if merges had a different color dot than normal commits). Can anyone clue me in? - Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
