Hi, On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 11:31:19PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > > I was told on IRC that this has been discussed already not so long ago, > > > and looking on the archive[1], all i seen was bikesheeding . Here is a > > > patch :-) > > > > Unfortunately, the implementation is not the problem, but picking the best > > name. The first letter "m" will be taken in a short while by the "merge" > > command for "rebase -i -p", so "message" is out, sadly. > > > > But the "rephrase" command will be part of the "rebase -i -p" series when > > I will finally be able to submit it. > > Also, I thought the general plan was to add such features to the > git-sequencer work which will (hopefully) eventually replace "rebase > -i". Dscho, can you give a brief update on how that is coming? Are > rebase patches worth thinking about? IMHO rebase -i is the important part. The user interface needs some serious overhaul, which I am in the slow process of doing. The sequencer then has to follow suit. As it stands, I think sequencer is not good enough yet to replace rebase -i (all my comments about that are public, except the heads-up I sent Stephan in private). To be frank, 'rebase -i -p' support, as it is in git.git is not good enough at all. That's why I was working on that, and I am close to finishing it. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
