Re: Local clone checks out wrong branch based on remote HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... I think there's also been discussion of a 
> protocol extension to transmit the information, although I don't know 
> where that ended up.

You can find them in the list of threads posted nearby.

The first round's protocol extension was not quite backward compatible
but in a benign way, in that it did not break anything but induced a
harmless warning from older ls-remote.  The second round did not have such
flaw but it got a "Yuck". 

    From: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
    Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 12:44:15 -0500
    Message-ID: <20081201174414.GA22185@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 (v2)] upload-pack: send the HEAD information

I somehow feel that the "Yuck" was addressed not to the patches but to the
problem the patch needs to address.

We could resurrect it if somebody is interested.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux