On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > The Autoconf macro AC_C_INLINE will redefine the inline keyword to whatever the > > current compiler supports (including possibly nothing). > > > > Signed-off-by: Allan Caffee <allan.caffee@xxxxxxxxx> > > As far as I can tell, this makes scriptlet to set ac_cv_c_inline and then > the result is written to confdefs.h: > > case $ac_cv_c_inline in > inline | yes) ;; > *) > case $ac_cv_c_inline in > no) ac_val=;; > *) ac_val=$ac_cv_c_inline;; > esac > cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF > #ifndef __cplusplus > #define inline $ac_val > #endif > _ACEOF > ;; > esac > > which is used only during the ./configure run but not during the actual > build. > > What am I missing? My mistake; it looks like this macro will only work the way I described when using a config.h, which I see git is not currently doing. I assumed that it would also provide a -D flag to the precompiler if a configuration header isn't used but this doesn't appear to be case (from a cursory glance at the macros definition). I could send a patch that would set up a config header, but that would mean adding an #include directive to all of the source files (or at least those using inline). OTOH doing so would allow git to make use of some other handy macros like AC_C_CONST. Do you think this is worth adding a configuration header? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html