On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: >> I deliberatly avoided "%.*s" in the former hunk (1) because of the posts >> that we had yesterday about potentially misbehaved fprintf in the case >> where the precision is 0; > > Didn't that turn out to be a false alarm? Yes. A party who will remain nameless was reading the wrong man page section (printf(1) vs printf(3)). :-) j. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
