Johannes Schindelin schrieb: > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Johannes Sixt wrote: >> I deliberatly avoided "%.*s" in the former hunk (1) because of the posts >> that we had yesterday about potentially misbehaved fprintf in the case >> where the precision is 0; > > Didn't that turn out to be a false alarm? Even better. I didn't follow the thread very closely. > I think, indeed, that you can avoid the memcpy() by using %.*s. The > private buffer is only used to make sure that the text is written in one > go anyway (i.e. that two sidebands messages are not written to the same > line because they use multiple calls to fprintf()/fwrite() per line), > right? It must be something like that, yes. ;) -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
