2009/3/9 Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx>: > John Tapsell wrote: > Not really. If bugs are in "unrelated" areas (if the topic changed some > API without changing its' other callers, fe), you can backstep between > each commit on the merged branch, remerge that commit (instead of the > tip) and then run the tests again. Doing that manually? Sounds really complicated, especially if the merge is nontrivial. > But really, such bugs should have > been detected prior to merging the branch, and in any case "git bisect" > will find the commit that introduced the bug for you either way. How will you detect bugs that arise from merging two trees, before you merge them? > For next time, please cut away those parts of the email you didn't > reply to. I had to scroll down to the bottom to make sure you hadn't > written more. I'll try sorry. Most email clients will hide the quoted text - there might be an option for that in your client? John -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html