Re: Help designing work flow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/3/9 Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx>:
> John Tapsell wrote:

> Not really. If bugs are in "unrelated" areas (if the topic changed some
> API without changing its' other callers, fe), you can backstep between
> each commit on the merged branch, remerge that commit (instead of the
> tip) and then run the tests again.

Doing that manually?  Sounds really complicated, especially if the
merge is nontrivial.

> But really, such bugs should have
> been detected prior to merging the branch, and in any case "git bisect"
> will find the commit that introduced the bug for you either way.

How will you detect bugs that arise from merging two trees, before you
merge them?

> For next time, please cut away those parts of the email you didn't
> reply to. I had to scroll down to the bottom to make sure you hadn't
> written more.

I'll try sorry.  Most email clients will hide the quoted text - there
might be an option for that in your client?

John
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux