Re: [PATCH] Brown paper bag fix for MinGW 64-bit stat

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 7 Mar 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > When overriding the identifier "stat" so that "struct stat" will be
> > substituted with "struct _stati64" everywhere, I tried to fix the calls
> > to the _function_ stat(), too, but I forgot to change the earlier
> > attempt "stat64" to "_stati64" there.
> >
> > So, the stat() calls were overridden by calls to _stati64() instead.
> >
> > Unfortunately, there is a function _stati64() so that I missed that
> > calls to stat() were not actually overridden by calls to mingw_lstat(),
> > but t4200-rerere.sh showed the error.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> 
> Since this is a fix-up to a new on 'master', I've applied the patch
> myself, but how would we want to handle MinGW related patches in general?
> 
> My preference is to have somebody I can rely on receiving Acked forwards
> from (or pulling from).

My preference is to keep the tried and tested mingw.git maintainer... ;-)

Note: IMHO Windows support is really at most beta quality; I would prefer 
only those using it who can fix bugs themselves, or have the means to make 
others fix the bugs.

So technically, we do not need such a strict and rigid process as for 
git.git itself, which is blessed with hundreds of contributors, due to 
which is really is ready for the end-user.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux