On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 01:07:56PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > [...] > > Speaking of which, Steffen (who cannot reply right now, since he is AFK > for a while) had a patch to install "remote.<branch>.push = HEAD" with > clone and remote. Would that be better? Are you referring to the patch he suggested in October 2007? I'm reading the October/November archives now, and it seems these things have been discussed before... Ok so re-reading the discussion from October/November 2007, it seems that we are having exactly the same discussion again! I did not investigate far enough back in time before firing up this thread again evidently. Reading the threads almost makes me sad. Steffen had a lot of great patches and ideas (implementing --current, adding tests, ...), but it was somehow dropped. After having read through this it would feel wrong somehow to even post patches on this topic, since I would effectively just redo what he already did. The only difference between his approach and what I am suggesting seems to be that he mostly wanted "git push" to do various useful tasks depending on configuration (the remote.<branch>.push stuff), while I mostly want "git push" to do nothing by default. We both agree that the current "git push" default behavior is very bad for our workflow (many developers against one or more shared repos). - Finn Arne -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
