Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add an (optional, since expensive) test for >2g clones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 05:58:23PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> > Leftover cruft using genrandom? (I'm guessing you tried random at first
> > to avoid compression, but I think your pack.compression=0 technique is
> > more sensible).
> 
> Actually, I left it in on purpose.  Yes, it happens to work right now, as 
> the packs are built with 0 compression and with 0 deltification.

Fair enough. A comment in the commit message or in the code might have
made that more clear, though...

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux