Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/2] make remote hangup warnings more friendly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:04:52AM -0800, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> Hmm.  It would be nice to clean up these messages, but I
> think the better way to do it is...
>  
> >      I think this would be improved somewhat with stderr processing to:
> > 
> >        remote: sh: bogus: command not found
> 
> ... because then we can have positive proof that the remote said
> something to the user, and we tagged it as being from the remote
> side, just like we do with progress data in sideband, and then the
> user can work from that information.  Any local side errors are
> very likely caused by the remote errors, so we shouldn't bother
> displaying them.

OK. I was hoping to avoid that because it's more work, but I think it is
a better path in the long run. I'll add it to do my todo list. Unless
you want to redeem yourself by working on it first. ;)

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux