Re: [PATCH 2/2] better introduction of GIT with USE_NSEC defined

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Kjetil Barvik <barvik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> ...
>>     How does this affect a use case where the same index file used with two 
>>     instances of git (one compiled with and another without USE_NSEC)?
>
>   If both persons in this use case use this patch, the one with USE_NSEC
>   defined will now be able to take full advantage of the nanosecond
>   timestamps at all times.
>
>   The one without USE_NSEC defined should not be able to tell the
>   difference (without looking into to details of the index file).

As long as the implementation does not give false cleanliness it is
perfectly fine; false dirtinesss is just a bit of wasted cycle.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux