On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 09:58:55AM +0100, Markus Heidelberg wrote: > > Yes. I don't know if they are documented anywhere, but the complete > > lookup order is: > > > > $ git grep -h -A8 ref_rev_parse_rules refs.c > > const char *ref_rev_parse_rules[] = { > > "%.*s", > > "refs/%.*s", > > "refs/tags/%.*s", > > "refs/heads/%.*s", > > "refs/remotes/%.*s", > > "refs/remotes/%.*s/HEAD", > > NULL > > }; > > Documented in git-rev-parse -> specifying revisions. Oh, indeed. Thanks for pointing it out. Though I think this may be part of what people mean when they say git documentation sucks. I had no idea where to look for such a thing, and it turns out it is in the manpage for a plumbing command that in theory I should never have to use. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html