Re: Does cloning a shallow repo require special setting in the cloned one?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 08:34:51AM +0200, Teemu Likonen wrote:

> On 2009-02-25 19:49 (-0800), roylee17 wrote:
> 
> > $ git clone --depth 1 git-full git-shallow2
> > 'git log' still gives a full history
> >
> > Why can't I clone a shallow repo from the git-full?
> > Does it requires some settings in the git-full repo?
> 
> I don't know the "why" part but using file:// URL should work:
> 
>     git clone --depth 1 file:///path/to/git-full git-shallow2

I don't think the behavior is intentional, but a side effect of the
fact that git takes some shortcuts when cloning locally. In particular,
it will try to copy or hardlink the object database rather than
transmitting over the git protocol locally. Using file:// has always
been the way to suppress that shortcut.

Perhaps to avoid surprise, that optimization should be turned off for
options which cause it to behave differently (like --depth). But I have
to wonder what the point of --depth is locally; if you are worried about
space, hardlinks (the default) or alternates ("clone -s") are a better
solution.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux