On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Well, this is _cache_. OTOH having pack cache would make it easy to have > resumable clone if you hit one of cached packfiles on resume... > > On the other hand I wonder what improvements it would give, as generating > packs with delta reuse is, I think, quite fast... Object enumeration is still an issue. A cache would allow skipping that part as well, making cached packs about the same as a simple file server. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
