David Kågedal <davidk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Alexandre Julliard <julliard@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> David Kågedal <davidk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Sorry, I didn't check this properly. I thought I was fixing inside the >>> git-checkout function, but this is git-read-commit-name which is used >>> in more than one place. >>> >>> But for git-checkout, I would like to see a much shorter list of named >>> commits, namely those that can be called "branches". I'll come up with >>> a better patch. >> >> I think it's reasonable to do this for the other uses of >> git-read-commit-name too, so your original patch looks OK. > > Actually, I'd like to go one step further. I'm only interested in > branches, and only in branches I can commit to. So only asking for > refs/heads seems the best solution. I think that's going too far. It's useful to be able to checkout a tag, or to cherry-pick from a remote branch. -- Alexandre Julliard julliard@xxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
