Re: [PATCH 04/13] remote: make get_remote_ref_states() always populate states.tracked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No, but I wanted Jeff's changes. I have checked that I can apply the
> "set HEAD" series, then Jeff's changes, then this latest series all to
> next w/o conflict.

Put another way, IMO, the set HEAD series, Jeff's changes, and this
series might very well be a single topic.

>> In other words, you make your series unworkable with if you introduce too
>> many dependencies.

For future reference, should I build on top of master or next?

j.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux