John Tapsell <johnflux@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It sounds like we have some sort of plan then. Will Nana's patch be > committed into mainline git? Then we can add the --abort porcelain I do not know what plan you are talking about, but that's not how the development works. If something is merged to 'pu', and you have a cool feature you would want to take advantage of it, you can build your cool feature on top of that particular topic. If the result looks reasonable they would cook for a while in 'next' for further polishing and then finally go to 'mainline'. I personally did not think "--keep" would need to be be part of a reasonable "merge --abort" implementation, but I may have missed some description of a viable design discussed on the list. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
