Hi, On Thu, 19 Feb 2009, Jay Soffian wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 4:21 AM, John Tapsell <johnflux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I often do 'git rebase -i HEAD~10' to rebase. Since afaics it > > doesn't matter if you go back 'too far' I just always use HEAD~10 even > > if it's just for the last or so commit. > > > > Would there be any objections to making 'git rebase -i' default to > > HEAD~10 or maybe 16 or 20. Having sensible defaults for commands > > helps a bit with making it easier to use. > > I think the following might be reasonable to support: > > $ git rebase -i -10 > $ git rebase -i -n -10 I disagree. You think -10 would be the same as HEAD~10? Think again. And include merge commits amongst the last 9 commits in your thoughts. Once you thought about such a scenario, "-10" is probably no longer that attractive, right? Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
