2009/2/19 SZEDER Gábor <szeder@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 09:13:49AM +0000, Pieter de Bie wrote: >> >> On 19 feb 2009, at 07:37, John Tapsell wrote: >> >>> Signed-off-by: John Tapsell <johnflux@xxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> Yes, this has been raised many times in #git now, so it makes >> sense to include it. > > A similar idea came around last week, and in turn Dscho explained why > such a change is not a good idea. I think he is fully right here. > > > <alpine.DEB.1.00.0902092228470.10279@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/109136 > > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 10:31:56PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > If we start along those lines, we also have to add documentation how > > to > > > > - split commit, That can be done from the "git rebase -i" screen? I'm guessing you mean choosing 'edit' and doing it from there. Same for all the other comments. How many of these can actually be done from the "git rebase -i" screen? > > - change authorship of commits, > > > > - deal with commits where --cherry-pick did not detect that they were applied already, > > > > - deal with merge commits, and > > > > - possibly a lot more. > > > > I do not think that this is a good way to spend valuable screen > > estate; I > > think that is what the man page should cover. > > > > I only made an exception for the deletion of lines, as people were > > actively burnt. Yes, they should have read the man page. But the > > consequences of not doing so were bad. > > > Regards, > Gábor > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
