Hi, On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Jay Soffian wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Johannes Schindelin > <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> Unless dwim_ref() is updated to handle FETCH_HEAD specially, and > >> return not the first SHA1, but the one not marked "not-for-merge". > >> Then the UI would at least be consistent, but this would not be > >> backward compatible. > > > > You cannot fix parsing FETCH_HEAD as a ref (and neither will you be able > > to do with PUSH_HEAD), as it can contain _more_ than one SHA-1s. This > > still holds true when ignoring the not-for-merge lines, as an octopus is > > a quite real possibility. > > An even better argument against than it not being backward compatible. :-) > > And there is no PUSH_HEAD. Heh, that's why I used the future tense :-) Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
