On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:29:53PM -0500, Jay Soffian wrote: > So both you and Junio have changed your mind since that thread then. > Because in that thread, you propose receive.guardCurrentBranch, which > was quite similar to today's receive.denyCurrentBranch. Junio then > argues that treating just the checked-out branch as special, as > opposed to all local branches is not the right thing to do: I have to admit, I found that thread a very interesting read, because I somehow missed it the first time and it seemed the opposite of what happened later. > So, I'm not sure what happened in the intervening time between the > receive.localBranches proposal and the receive.denyCurrentBranch > implementation that suddenly what is basically guardCurrentBranch > became a good idea. I think what happened (partially) is that I never read the original, then at GitTogether somebody (Sam?) was complaining about usability issues, so I wrote the denyCurrentBranch patch. Why and how people changed their minds is a mystery to me, though. -Peff PS I seem to have an uncanny knack for writing a patch, then finding out that Dscho wrote the exact same patch months or years earlier. I think this is the third time it has happened. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
