Jakub Narebski wrote:
> Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Jay Soffian wrote:
>
> > > I think this change may be okay, but I think to go with it the
> > > cover-letter and all the patches should have a "References:" header
> > > with the message-id given by --in-reply-to.
> >
> > That's a completely separate issue. I'm only proposing to change
> > what is formatted as a reply to what, the In-Reply-To and References
> > formatting is handled by the existing code.
[...]
> patches had both '--in-reply-to' message id AND cover letter id in
> "References:" header. That would make for safer threading...
Oh, now I see what you meant.
It seems that right now, send-email appends the right references for
--thread mode, and format-patch only does the one-reference case.
I'll try and make a patch for that.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
