Re: [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, david@xxxxxxx wrote:

> please be careful with the term 'deprecated', just becouse you would do 
> something a different way doesn't make it 'deprecated', that term should 
> only be used for features that are on their way out of the product, but 
> haven't been removed yet.

It is not deprecated because I do not like it.  Actually, I am pretty 
indifferent about the pushing into a non-bare repository.

It is deprecated because a lot of people active in the Git community spend 
a real lot of time explaining to a whole bunch of new users on IRC and 
recently even on this list why their pushing into a non-bare repository 
does not work, and why their suggestions how to solve the issue does not 
work either.

Hth,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux