On 2009-02-16, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > A tracking system is just a tool. You need to have a competent and stable > project secretary whose job is to look after the issues database. The > tasks involved are to expire the stale ones, to reject invalid entries, to > prod the bug reporter for additional information, to find a volunteer to > take up on an individual issue, to prod the bug reporter for confirmation > on the fix once it is ready, and to close completed issues. As I've been against web-based bug-trackers before I'd like to present an idea which, imho, is a good compromise. I'm afraid that the number of false bug-reports will increase dramatically with the introduction of such a bug-tracker, eating up time of the volunteers. Also, as I mentioned, I really dislike using web-based tools. If we had such a secretary who's not only familiar with the bugtracker but also familiar enough with git and it's development organization, he/she could work with the system, filter out the noise and mail real bugs or well-thought-through feature-requests to this mailing-list (with a link back to the bugtracker) with the full text of the bug and maybe his/her oppinion about it. But maybe that's just duplication of work, in your eyes. Greetings, Jojo -- Johannes Gilger <heipei@xxxxxxxxxxxx> http://hackvalue.de/heipei/ GPG-Key: 0x42F6DE81 GPG-Fingerprint: BB49 F967 775E BB52 3A81 882C 58EE B178 42F6 DE81 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
