human readable diffs, was Re: [PATCH v2] config: Use parseopt.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

>     I also noticed that the diff was impossible to read because it 
>     matched the lines with only an indented close brace or whitespace 
>     between the preimage and the postimage too aggressively.  Your 
>     --patience did seem to help a little bit, at least it produced a 
>     different result, but not much (not that patience was meant to make 
>     this kind of change easier to read).  It may have helped if we had 
>     that "do not match trivial lines too aggressively just to reduce the 
>     patch size" option.

Yeah, I think that your objections to my '--collapse-non-alnums' patch 
show to be relevant especially with this patch: an '} else {' matches, but 
actually disturbs readability.

So an option would be nice, indeed, which can merge a single matching line 
(or a given maximal number of matching lines) between runs of a certain 
minimal number of _non-matching_ lines.

But how to call it?

And how determine the ideal ratio between matching/non-matching lines 
until which to consider the matching lines to be non-matches?  Maybe a 
simple fraction would be enough...

Or maybe an absolute number of matching lines?  But it is obvious how to 
construct a case where this breaks down.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux