Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > --suppress-cc=cc is supposed to suppress harvesting addresses from any > Cc: lines. However, in the case where the Cc: line contained the sender, > it would only suppress if --suppress-cc=self. Perhaps I am personally slightly in favor of your interpretation, but the current behaviour makes sort of sense, too. To everybody, himself is always special (and that is why we have 'self'); I do not think it is entirely unreasonable if --suppress-cc=cc meant remove people from Cc list but I am special. > And here's a re-roll of this one. Sheesh, that logic was too subtle for > my brain. Perhaps it is easier to clarify the goal by updating the tests to define what needs to happen first? Working from tests often makes the end result much more robust than randomly modifying the existing code here and there until it happens to start doing something you think it should do. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
