On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 08:48:42PM -0500, Jay Soffian wrote: > Damn, I knew I wasn't going to slip that one by. :-) "Given enough eyeballs, all ugly hacks are shallow." :) > > I see that the inputs and outputs aren't exactly the same in both cases, > > Which is why I didn't refactor it. The extra code needed to massage > what builtin-remote.c has to the existing function in builtin-clone.c > would've been more LOC than the duplicate code (I think...). > > BUT > > I'll try. :-) See what you can do. But personally, I am not as concerned with reducing LOC as I am with encapsulating system logic like "this is how you guess which ref is HEAD". And if you can do both, great. :) -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
