Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thomas Rast <trast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Right now it's just the patch-id. Maybe filtering (author,subject)
> > and then picking the one that is the most similar could work.
>
> Yeah, I actually was thinking about matching the (date, author) tuple and
> nothing else, as it is unlikely you would have dups.
Thanks, good idea. I changed the code to parse the required data, and
we're now up to 1502 annotations.
Unfortunately I noticed there's a bug in the mail input stage:
Python's mailbox module assumes any '^From ' line starts a new mail,
while gmane apparently uses a slightly different format based on the
double newlines too (and they always have the same 'From
news@xxxxxxxxx Tue Mar 04 03:33:20 2003' separator too), and doesn't
quote '^From ' in the bodies. So any mail containing such body lines
got chopped down in the middle, and any patches contained in them
won't apply because of the missing headers.
A quick perl run shows that there are 26 mails affected among the
89000+ mails that I've (again) imported. The fix should be easy, but
I'm already short on sleep.
> I find the "Extra-Notes:" tag a bit too loud, but I am probably a minority
> who thinks everything but the Message-ID can be dropped, so please don't
> take it as a feature request ;-)
I refactored the final formatting stage a bit to let it do several
notes trees, and you can now take your pick:
git://repo.or.cz/trackgit.git notes/full
git://repo.or.cz/trackgit.git notes/terse
The latter only has 'Message-Id' and 'Archived-At'.
--
Thomas Rast
trast@{inf,student}.ethz.ch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
