Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>: > Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Some comments: >> >> 1. Is the staggered indentation intentional? It looks awful, and the >> only use I can think of is to separate unstaged from staged >> changes. But surely there must be a more obvious way of doing so. > > Probably not. > >> 2. Why do staged changes get a letter marking what happened, but >> unstaged changes do not? > > Bug? FWIW, the original patch from October shows: > > M changed > M M changed-again > M changed-staged > D deleted > D deleted-staged > > (where changed-again has both staged changes and further changes in the > work tree). > > The gap between these two are to show the rename similarity index, which > we could do without. I have a question. Why do you have the gap for the rename similarity between the two but not between the second status and the filename? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
