Yann Simon <yann.simon.fr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The user can see and edit the signed-off in the commit dialog
> before committing.
>
> For new lines in the commit dialog, use Text.DELIMITER for
> plateform neutrality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yann Simon <yann.simon.fr@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> This patch only applies after the 2 previous patches.
> If you want to, I could probably modify this patch so that it would
> apply on the current origin.
The other two have been applied so no need to rebase.
> diff --git a/org.spearce.egit.ui/src/org/spearce/egit/ui/internal/dialogs/CommitDialog.java b/org.spearce.egit.ui/src/org/spearce/egit/ui/internal/dialogs/CommitDialog.java
> index 9d062cc..8f85c08 100644
> --- a/org.spearce.egit.ui/src/org/spearce/egit/ui/internal/dialogs/CommitDialog.java
> +++ b/org.spearce.egit.ui/src/org/spearce/egit/ui/internal/dialogs/CommitDialog.java
> @@ -67,6 +68,8 @@
> */
> public class CommitDialog extends Dialog {
>
> + private static Pattern signedOffPattern = Pattern.compile("(.|\r|\n)*Signed-off-by: .*(\r|\n)*"); //$NON-NLS-1$
Wouldn't "[.\r\n]" be easier to use here than "(.|\r|\n)"?
> @@ -214,6 +217,30 @@ public void widgetDefaultSelected(SelectionEvent arg0) {
> signedOffButton.setText(UIText.CommitDialog_AddSOB);
> signedOffButton.setLayoutData(GridDataFactory.fillDefaults().grab(true, false).span(2, 1).create());
>
> + signedOffButton.addSelectionListener(new SelectionListener() {
> + boolean alreadySigned = false;
> + public void widgetSelected(SelectionEvent arg0) {
> + if (alreadySigned)
> + return;
> + if (signedOffButton.getSelection()) {
> + alreadySigned = true;
Huh. So I can only push the checkbox once, and that after that
its just an idiot switch?
If that's really going to be how it is, maybe we should disable
the checkbox?
FWIW, git-gui actually looks for the user's Signed-off-by line in the
text buffer. If it can't find it, then it appends it onto the end.
That way the user can delete the line and do the sign off again if
they messed up somehow.
And actually, given that this is a checkbox and not a button, maybe
we should be able to *delete* the SBO line when the user tries to
uncheck the checkbox. Which then gets into, what if the user made
an edit to the text and changed the SBO line, should this box get
unchecked automatically by some form a listener on the text box?
Food for thought. I'm not sure what it should be. But if it were
a checkbox, as a user I'd like it to be bi-directional (both add
and remove my SBO) and also uncheck when I edit or delete the SBO
line in the message box.
--
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
