Hi, On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Elijah Newren wrote: > In the source repository, I noticed that 6 of the earliest commits in > one root of history looked like: > > /--E > / / > A--C--D > / > B > > In the "mirrored" repository, I notice this history had been modified > so that it looked like > > E > / > A--C--D > / > B > > The latter history seems much more sane to me; since D is a child of > C, making E a merge of C and D seemed really weird. I did pour over > the output of git fast-export --all to see if the merge directives > were as expected, in order to see whether git fast-export or git > fast-import were to be credited with the history fix. It looks to me > like git-fast-export reports no merge parents for E, so this seems to > be on the fast-export side. > > Is this, by chance, intentional? (I'm using git-1.6.0.6, if it matters.) Nope. Please try to make a reproduction recipe (preferably as a patch to t9301); it seems that you are half-way there already. Thanks, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
