On Sunday 08 February 2009 03:41:04 Santi Béjar wrote: > 2009/2/8 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. <bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Saturday 07 February 2009 16:21:49 Santi Béjar wrote: > >> Although it does not matter in general it is handled different by > >> "git clone", as it removes it to make the "humanish" name of the > >> new repository. > > I'm mixed on this, particularly with the increasing numbers of MySysGit > > users we attract. Perhaps it would be better to teach clone to remove > > .bdl as well. > I don't have an opinion as I don't know exactly the situation for > MSysGit users, but I don't think it is a good idea to have two > suffixes. Why not? It seems preferable to use .bundle since it is more easily recognized, but .bdl is nice for system that are limited to a 3 byte extensions. Existing MIME types have multiple extensions. It is unlikely Git is run on a system that only allows 3 bytes extensions though, most of the ones that I'm aware of don't like 38 byte filenames. I'm warming to this patch -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
