Re: [PATCH] don't append 'opaquelocktoken:' in PUT and MOVE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Why does request->lock->token have the prefix at all?
> 
> While typing my reply, I realise it is unwarranted.

Huh?  What does that mean?  Does lock->token have that prefix (including 
the colon) or not?

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux