Pieter de Bie <pdebie@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I played around a bit with the 'Clang' static analyser, and tried to run git's > source code through it. It comes up with a few possible errors, so I thought > you might find it interesting. I took a quick glance, and it also seems to > have a few false positives, but it might still be worth to take a look. > > The results can be found here: > > http://frim.frim.nl/git-analyse/ Hmm, I took a quick look at a few, and they looked nonsense, but perhaps I am misreading things. For example: http://frim.frim.nl/git-analyse/report-uxXiUR.html#EndPath I am assuming that we follow the control flow of the labelled comments, so I followed along from [1] to [7] and then saw these: [8] loop condition is false, execution continues on line 1492 1483: for (i = 0; i < array->nr; i++) { ... } [9] taking false branch 1492: if (array->nr <= i) return NULL; [10] dereference of null pointer. 1495: c->object.flags |= ... The thing is, if [8] exits, "i < array->nr" is not true anymore, and there is no way you can take false branch of "if (array->nr <= i)" in the immediately next step [9]. and reach point [10]. So it is either that the tool does not know how "for" and "if" statement works in C language, or I am completely misunderstanding what the in-line comments are trying to tell me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html