On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 10:56:06AM -0500, Jay Soffian wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> + /* don't delete non-remote branches */
> >> + if (prefixcmp(refname, "refs/remotes")) {
> >> + if (!prefixcmp(refname, "refs/heads/"))
> >> + string_list_append(abbrev_branch(refname),
> >> + branches->skipped);
> >> + return 0;
> >> + }
> >
> > Why does this version introduce the "only skip refs/heads/" check?
> > Shouldn't we also protect other random refs (or if not, shouldn't the
> > commit message explain why not)?
>
> Note that we do protect refs, but we only emit messages about those
> refs which are obviously branches. Frankly, I wasn't sure what other
> kinds of refs there might be, so wasn't sure what an appropriate
> message is for anything other than those under refs/heads.
Oh, right. I was just reading it wrong. Your new version with the two
comments makes it even more clear.
> Note: A non-remote branch was not removed; to delete it use:
> git branch -d ...
>
> Note: Tags were not removed, to delete them use:
> git tag -d ...
>
> Note: Some refs were ignored:
> refs/whoknows/whatthisis
> refs/whoknows/whatthiscouldbe
Nah, I think deleting branches was the main intention. So we are
properly protecting everything now, but only warning about what you
_might_ have meant.
> But that's getting a little insane me thinks.
Agreed.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
