Hi, On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Eric Kidd wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Johannes Schindelin > <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > When checking if running in a bare repository, the work tree has to be > > reset, otherwise we will be checking the temporary state, which is > > always non-bare. > > Just a few minutes after you posted this patch, I posted a > nearly-identical fix for the same issue: > > http://marc.info/?l=git&m=123368695831812&w=2 > > (My patch includes a test case, too, but it's not very important.) So clearly yours is superior. > This raises another interesting question: Why doesn't 'git > filter-branch' actually check whether subcommands succeed? That's unintentional; AFAIR there was a "set -e" in cg-admin-rewritehist that I tried to do away with by introducing explicit '&&' conjunctions where needed. So all those unchecked subcommands are bugs. Thanks, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html