Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Introduce config variable "diff.primer"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 3 Feb 2009, Jakub Narebski wrote:

> I still think that naming this configuration variable (or configuration 
> section in the reverse primer.diff) 'primer' is not a good idea, because it is 
> quite obscure and not well known word.  In computer related context I have 
> seen it only when talking about introductory / novice / basic level 
> documentation ('primer (textbook)' meaning).  Git user, who might be not a 
> native English speaker, shouldn't have to look up in dictionary what it is 
> about...
> 
> I think that 'defaults' or 'options' would be a much better name.

Point well taken.  Let's consider "primer" the working name.  The final name 
will be the last finishing touch once (and if) we achieve consensus on the 
functionality.  Ultimately the name is best chosen after the functionality is 
certain.  IOW, open to discussion.

                                     -- Keith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux