Re: [PATCH] Switch receive.denyCurrentBranch to "refuse"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The other affects
> a small number of users who are doing something which is labeled in many
> places as a bad thing to want to do.

Sorry, but I do not agree with this.

What is bad is to push into a repository that is used for editing.  That
is labelled as a bad thing to want to do.

It is often the easiest to push and then run "reset --hard" (perhaps from
the post-update script) to propagate your change to a repository that is
not usually used for editing.  E.g. that has always been the way I update
my private repository at k.org that I use for final testing before pushing
out the results that I built and tested on my personal machine.  People
who have live web pages served from a checkout do that, too.  It is not a
bad thing to do at all, and you can find many instructions with google
without spending a lot of time to do exactly that.

    http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2008/7/1/2315924
    http://utsl.gen.nz/git/post-update
    http://groups.google.com/group/sl-ugr/browse_thread/thread/04e4c4bd6ce174af

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux