Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2009, #07; Wed, 28)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> How about installing
>
> 	[branch "master"]
> 		remote = origin
> 		merge = refs/heads/master
>
> by default?  It is a safe bet that this will be the case for 99% of all 
> users that want to clone an empty repository (especially if they are 
> putting their public repositories on something like repo.or.cz, where you 
> cannot change the default branch from "master" to something else).

I think this is a reasonable thing to do.  Even though cloning from a void
is not entirely a reasonable thing to do to begin with, because we are
going ahead to allow it now, it would be the best thing to do when cloning
a repository served by the currently deployed git.

We _could_ do better if we were to resurrect my earlier series to add
"where does the HEAD point at" protocol extension, but even then we would
need a fallback like your suggestion when talking to older servers anyway.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux