Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] chain kill signals for cleanup functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:13:00AM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> Jeff King schrieb:
>> > One fix would be to just "signal(SIGINT, SIG_DFL)" at the top. But I
>> > think it makes the test cleaner to just switch to a more reliable
>> > signal. The patch would look something like what is below. But I need to
>> > know what exit code Windows generates for SIGTERM. Johannes?
>> 
>> The same as with SIGINT: 3.
>
> Hmm. Clever.
>
> Junio, can you apply this on top of the jk/signal-cleanup topic?

Will do, but I've been sick today, haven't caught up with the list
traffic, and I do not think I'll be reading my mails for the rest of the
day either.  It may take some time for it to appear in the public
repositories.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux