Hi,
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > - error("refusing to update checked out branch: %s", name);
> > + error("refusing to update checked out branch: %s\n"
> > + "if you know what you are doing, you can allow it by "
> > + "setting\n\n"
> > + "\tgit config receive.denyCurrentBranch true\n", name);
>
> Shouldn't this be
>
> git config receive.denyCurrentBranch ignore
>
> instead of "true"?
Right.
However, as Junio pointed out, we do not want to give this resolution in
the error message. I am now leaning more to something like
refusing to update checked out branch '%s' in non-bare repository
Hmm?
Old-timers will know "oh, what the hell, I did not mark my repository as
bare!", and new-timers will no longer be confused.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
