Zabre wrote: > > Oh just one (probably stupid) thing : <tree-ish> does represent a > directory being the root of a tree of folders (which has been added to the > index), does it? > This is the way I understand it at the moment. It must be a convention I > don't know just yet. (I need to investigate on this) > Ok I found in the doc (in the "The Object Database" section) what trees are about, seems a little bit more obscure, so I guess I'm not ready for this right now. (I'm a beginner trying to use git for a simple regular workflow, managing code and other documents) http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#the-object-database I guess <tree-ish> refers to such an object, and you use it in order to revert it from the Object Database. I'll keep this idea in mind for when I'll try to restore data from tricky last-chance "stores", there is a section about such things in the doc : http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/user-manual.html#fixing-mistakes I think that in a normal everyday use, the small index modification I can do using the previous advices can do the job (or am I wrong?) -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/%28beginner%29-git-rm-tp2231416p2234918.html Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
