On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:30 PM, David Abrahams <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'm absolutely certain I'm not the first person to have raised this > issue, so feel free to point me at the threads where I can get the > rationale... but: to me it looks like git's choice of terminology hurts > its adoption and learnability. > > For example, why couldn't the "index" be called the "stage" instead? > That, along with knowing that "git add" was a synonym for "git stage" > would have flattened the learning curve considerably for me. +1 I think several people have mentioned it, and there have been different possible actions, but nothing concrete AFAIK. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
