I have not used the bundle stuff, but yes, it seems to be a better fit for what I am trying to do. Thanks, Nathan Panike On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:27:18AM -0600, Nathan W. Panike wrote: > >> I think I have an unusual workflow where my patch makes sense, >> although it probably does not for the vast majority of git users. I >> regularly use 3 machines: S, L, and H. I keep my work synchronized by >> using git. Normally, I fetch from S to L or to H, depending on which >> machine I am working on at the moment. I also push from L or H to S. >> I sporadically lose connectivity to S, so I have a hook in the repo on >> S to send a backup email to me on mail server M, which has a more >> reliable connection. This email also serves as a reminder when I > > Have you considered sending a bundle instead of a patch in the backup > email? That is the more exact equivalent of a push (i.e., it preserves > your actual commits, sha1 and all). > > -Peff > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
