Hi, On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, Lars Hjemli wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 21:35, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Could we switch to incremental refinements once a series hits next, > > pretty please? > > The problem in this particular case is that the design has changed so > much since the first iteration that we're not really talking about > incremental refinements but rather a different approach to the same > problem. > > If you want me to build on top of the series in next anyways, would it > be acceptable if the first patch on top of ee306d2d59 reverts the > previous attempt? I think the rest of the series will be easier to > review that way. I'd appreciate that. Since 'next' will be rewound eventually, that first iteration and the revert will disappear at some stage. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
