On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:43:20PM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 19:39, Chad Dombrova <chadrik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > what's the case against it, other than the obvious, that it will take more > > work? > > Good question, I think it was mostly that, someone has to implement it > (possibly as part of packv4). Backwards compatibility is of course > always an concern, but I'm not too familiar with the subject, perhaps > other people on the list (or even those were at the gittogether) can > comment? If I understand his proposal correctly, such objects must _not_ be part of a pack. The whole idea is splitting them _more_, not less. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
