Re: Deleting remote branch pointed by remote HEAD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote 
about 'Re: Deleting remote branch pointed by remote HEAD':
>I think it might be more appropriate to just care less about a broken
>symref, explain what's wrong if the user actually tries to use it, and
>otherwise mostly ignore it.

That sounds reasonable.  It's not like "find" complains about every broken 
symlink it sees.  Simple traversal or the repository should probably not 
complain about every broken symref.
-- 
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.                     ,= ,-_-. =. 
bss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                     ((_/)o o(\_))
ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy           `-'(. .)`-' 
http://iguanasuicide.net/                      \_/     

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux